A Search for New Music in the New Year

Waking up late and having a wide open schedule (New Years Day AND Sunday!) in which to greet the new year, I lay in bed, skimming through my email. Buried among the fantastic offers to get all of my prescription drugs from Canada and appeals to help replant the rainforest (probably a good idea), I found a notice from Amazon that it’s got 1000 albums on sale (for digital download) at only $5. Cool; I’ve got time, space in my Cloud Player, and a $25 gift card I can burn through.
With eager anticipation, I start surveying the options. And, instantly, I’m struck with a couple of impressions.

1) There are a lot of groups I’ve never heard of before. A lot. Really, really. A whole lot.

2) A lot of them have got some of the dumbest band names imaginable. A lot. Really… well, you know.

Before I go into some particular examples, I recognize that dumb band names have been around since time immemorial. Adam and Eve probably had a duo called “The Fig Leafs”. And maybe they rocked the hardest; a bad name doesn’t necessarily mean a bad band. The Beatles: not a great name.

But… well, take for instance…

Slightly Stoopid: I know when I’m looking for the Next Big Thing, evidence of diminished mental capacity, subterrainian self esteem, and suspect spelling skills, is often just what the doctor - in this case an experienced therapist - ordered.

Fitz and the Tantrums: Add to the above a violent temper and antisocial tendancies…

Yuck:  I’ll bet that critics who didn’t care for their self titled album were able to write very short reviews. I mean, it almost reviews itself.

Rapper Big Pooh: Alright, I know that Winnie the Pooh wasn’t, in any respect, an “excremental” reference, but, come on… I would think that being called “Big Pooh” is not often going to be taken as complimentary. His album, Dirty Pretty Things (Again, what are we talking about here?) is available in a Deluxe Edition. Did listeners actually request “More Pooh!”?

I could go on and on.

If anyone reading this blog cares to offer their favorite Bad Band Names, bring it on.     

The Value of Music

There’s a website I really like called guitarsquid.com.
It’s put together with a terrific sense of humor and I’ve subscribed to their newsletter for awhile.

Recently, they ran an article/list entitled “12 Extremely Disappointing Facts about Popular Music”. 
Visit their site for the entirety, but I’ll offer some examples here:
#3: Ke$ha’s “Tik-Tok” sold more copies than ANY Beatles single.
#5: The Black Eyed Peas’ “I Gotta Feeling” is more popular than any Elvis or Simon & Garfunkel song.
#11: The cast of “Glee” has had more songs chart than the Beatles.

I think you get the idea.

But, as a lifelong fan of music - popular and otherwise – I’m happy to report that none of this statistical information bothers me.
Not even a little bit.

As a man solidly invested in middle age (55 and 1/2 years of age),  I have no problem with the success of Ke$ha (how do you pronounce that?), Peas of any variety, or even the artist named Flo Rida, who I’ve never even heard of.

Outstanding music – music of truly lasting quality and value – will simply stand the test of time.

We might be listening to the Beatles fifty or a hundred years in the future, not because they were wearing those cute Justin Beiber haircuts, but because the work still resonates with the listener. Bach and Beethoven never had a website, Miles Davis and Leonard Bernstein were never “liked” on Facebook, but the music they made isn’t in any way diminished.

The Internet is a great equalizer.
It’s now as easy to download a song from that cool band you heard at the local pub last weekend as it is to get access to ”Stairway to Heaven”.
But that doesn’t make one just as good as the other.

A Book Recommendation: “Guitar: An American Life” by Tim Brookes

I’m not always going to write about only guitar -related subjects here, but I just recently finished reading this work.
Tim Brookes’ Guitar: An American Life is an engaging trip involving guitars in general and one in particular.
When baggage handlers destroy his favorite instrument, the author decides to have his “dream guitar” built by master-guitar-maker Rick Davis. The book alternates a chapter chronicling the process of what goes into hand making an acoustic guitar with one offering an overview of the guitars evolution through history.
Brookes maintains a good balance between the public and private perspectives, writing in a conversational style that flowed in a really comfortable way. When I finished, I went back and revisited a few spots where there was information I wanted to remember and found myself, pretty  much  effortlessly, re-reading whole chapters. That alone is a testament to how smoothly the book moves along.
If I was offer one criticism, it would be that there was no photograph of the final byproduct of the Davis and Brookes collaboration. After spending so many pages invested in the project, I really wanted a good look at the finished product.

An old friend asks a couple of guitar questions

A few weeks ago, I had one of those rare and wonderful experiences; catching up with an old friend.
John Dawson and I had known each other as teenagers, went to the same high school together, worked together one summer doing landscaping/yard work, and he even invited me on one of the few fishing trips I’ve ever taken. (I have a thirty-some year old photograph to prove it.) His wife, my girlfriend, and the two of us had a terrific time when we met for a meal in a small town outside of Annapolis, MD.

Since then we’ve kept in contact and his kind comments about a couple of guitar videos I posted on YouTube lead to some questions. I asked him if I could answer them here on the blog.

John wrote:
“My son tried on a few occasions to give me some beginners lessons only to remark that I looked like I was in pain trying to hold the guitar right handed. He had me turn the guitar over and hold it left handed at which point he told me I am a natural “lefty” because my hand addressed the neck in a more relaxed manner. At one point he was helping me shop for a left handed guitar and he was recommending that I buy a Fender Squire Strat kit to learn on rather than an acoustic because the Strat would be more forgiving if I crunched a chord.
What is your opinion about righty vs lefty and acoustic vs a hard body electric?”

Righty/Lefty: There are some pretty pronounced schools of thought on this one. The classical guitarist, Julian Bream, felt the guitar shouldn’t be thought of as either left or right handed. He considered it an instrument like the piano, where both hands are being used and it doesn’t matter which is naturally dominant.
Then there are players - Jimi Hendrix and Paul McCartney are obvious examples - who flipped it over and made it work out pretty well. Would  they have played as well if they had just picked it up the way most of us did? Probably not, if it was uncomfortable.
There’s a definite downside to the unconventional approach, though.  Both standard notation and tablature are tougher to read because they have to be mentally “flipped” from the way they appear on the page. Plus, the left handed guitar (or a right handed one set up for the lefty) is just harder to find. Go to any guitar shop and you would be lucky to find two or three of them.
There’s something to be said for trying it both ways, if you’re so inclined, and going with your gut.
My personal opinion, based on my teaching experience, is more in line with Mr. Bream.

Acoustic/Electric: This is an easy one. Which one do you see yourself playing?
Electric guitars have lighter guage strings and lower action in general, but a good acoustic (with light guage strings) set up pretty well shouldn’t be much more of a challenge to play.
I recommend the guitar that matches the players taste in music. If you’re a Stevie Ray Vaughn fan, that acoustic is probably not going to feel like it’s taking you where you want to go. Playing John Denver tunes on an electric is going to seem weird, as well.
Get whichever instrument you feel you’d be eager to pick up the most often. It’s got to be something you enjoy.

Visit my YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/jimwestlyn  to check out those tutorial videos I mentioned.

Welcome to my Blog

I decided to publish a blog for a couple of reasons.
First, to open a discussion about music.
In my 35 plus years of playing and teaching the guitar and piano I’ve been fortunate to accumulate a wealth of experience. From embarrasingly bad garage bands to once in a lifetime performances, I’ve learned a great deal from every moment.
In the past few years, teaching has grown to become a real passion for me and the more opportunities I’ve had in teaching, the more fascinated I’ve become with the possibilities.
And, second, as a venue to explore other personal interests; writing, social entrepreneurism, what it’s like to be facing the future at 55. In that respect, I’m going to leave it kind of open-ended.
It’s my intention that this blog be as interesting, informative, and entertaining as possible. I’m hoping to “elevate the discourse” here, keeping the commentary thoughtful and respectful.
If you are of a like mind, I’m looking forward to your contribution.

I’ll start by throwing out this question:

What is the “State of Music” right now?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.